Published on Snurblog (http://snurb.info)

Home > Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum (FGZ RISC 2024)

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum (FGZ RISC 2024)

Sat, 27/04/2024 - 05:50 — Snurb
Politics [1]
Elections [2]
Government [3]
Polarisation [4]
Journalism [5]
Industrial Journalism [6]
‘Fake News’ [7]
Social Media [8]
Echo Chambers and Filter Bubbles [9]
Social Media Network Mapping [10]
Twitter [11]
Dynamics of Partisanship and Polarisation in Online Public Debate (ARC Laureate Fellowship) [12]
FGZ RISC 2024 [13]

Indicators of Social Cohesion in Social Media and Online Media [14]

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum

Axel Bruns

  • 25 Apr. 2024 – Keynote presented at the Indicators of Social Cohesion in Social Media and Online Media [14] symposium, Hamburg

Presentation Slides

Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case of the Australian Voice to Parliament Referendum [15] from Axel Bruns [16]

Abstract

The focus of concerns about societal fragmentation in public communication is shifting. Instead of the retreat into echo chambers and filter bubbles that had been assumed in previous research, and which has not been confirmed by empirical evidence, greater emphasis is now being placed on polarisation along issue, ideological, and identity lines. Mild forms of polarisation can be productive, but at elevated levels polarisation variously leads individuals to dismiss alternative viewpoints, to attack political opponents verbally and even physically, and to embrace and disseminate (dis)information because of its ideological stance rather than its truthfulness. Social media play a particular role as a public space where such dynamics manifest, and activities there are themselves fed by the posting and sharing of material from mainstream as well as fringe media. This keynote introduces destructive polarisation as a particularly pernicious form of polarisation that is distinguished by a number of distinct symptomatic features; it illustrates these features and their consequences with a case study of the Australian referendum for an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in October 2023, which was affected by a particularly destructive and ultimately successful campaign to polarise the Australian electorate.

[Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 License]
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. -->

Source URL:http://snurb.info/node/2975

Links
[1] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/47 [2] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/122 [3] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/113 [4] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/208 [5] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/81 [6] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/82 [7] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/169 [8] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/125 [9] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/171 [10] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/84 [11] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/121 [12] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/196 [13] http://snurb.info/taxonomy/term/216 [14] https://fgz-risc.de/veranstaltungen/details/indicators-of-social-cohesion-in-social-media-and-online-media [15] https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/dynamics-of-destructive-polarisation-in-mainstream-and-social-media-the-case-of-the-australian-voice-to-parliament-referendum/267519205 [16] https://www.slideshare.net/Snurb